Is Our Political Identity Overtaking Our Religious Identity When Choosing a Mate?
by Trent Gilliss, senior editor
Stephanie Coontz’s provocative opinion piece in today’s New York Times touches on some interesting dilemmas facing men and women in modern America. It’s well worth reading and is a fun conversation starter with your spouse and parents. But, it was the above infographic accompanying Coontz’s commentary that caught this editor’s eye.
For the most part, the top five traits that men look for in potential wives have changed very little in 70 years. In 1939, the five most important qualities were:
- Dependable character
- Emotional stability, maturity
- Pleasing disposition
- Mutual attraction, love
- Good health
And, in 2008:
- Mutual attraction, love
- Dependable character
- Emotional stability, maturity
- Education, intelligence
- Pleasing disposition
The big mover: education and intelligence. It climbed from #11 to #4. Good health dropped two positions, and I suspect will plummet further down the list in the coming decades. The romantic in me is heartened to see that love and attraction are sitting atop the field.
For the purposes of this blog, though, the precipitous drop in having a similar religious background and the slight rise in men seeking a woman whose political background is similar to his own is intriguing. It seems men’s personal identities are mirroring our larger cultural identity. As U.S. society has become increasingly divided and hyper-partisan in political terms, men are assigning more value to having a like-minded partner in the political persuasion department. Will this trait continue to rise in importance? I hope not.
Source: “Measuring Mate Preferences: A Replication and Extension” by Christine B. Whelan, University of Pittsburgh, and Christie F. Boxer and Mary Noonan, University of Iowa
Source: beingblog
39 Notes/ Hide
-
available03 liked this
-
aflfootballimages liked this
-
daughters45go liked this
-
dakinishir reblogged this from beingblog
-
missiongroover liked this
-
bkfiend liked this
-
marionatrandom liked this
-
studioschmudio liked this
-
damnthatshitiswhack liked this
-
inquies liked this
-
trentgilliss reblogged this from beingblog
-
valkaykus reblogged this from beingblog
-
cristinadls liked this
-
cristinadls reblogged this from beingblog
-
musicforthemusicallychallenged liked this
-
dakinishir liked this
-
meganooch reblogged this from beingblog
-
leavemebackstage liked this
-
theclassiccase reblogged this from seastepp
-
mjcjla reblogged this from beingblog
-
outofthedarkness reblogged this from beingblog
-
sapphireblues liked this
-
ayocanada liked this
-
thatbeautifulday liked this
-
sewzsan liked this
-
hijinksensued reblogged this from beingblog and added:
Favorite paragraph:...pretty great article. I didn’t really agree
-
thinkfreeordiebored reblogged this from beingblog and added:
would be considered weird back...day given I’d like
-
mjcjla liked this
-
atributetoorange liked this
-
cauldronsofreverb said:
maybe the results would be different if they used the word “partner” instead of “wife?” Maybe people have romantic ideas about marriage that don’t necessarily affect how they choose romantic partners (which happens more frequently than marriage??)
-
allthosewhowonder liked this
-
restinpeas liked this
-
coffeecakeicecream reblogged this from beingblog
-
taylorlorenz liked this
-
almaswithinalmas liked this
-
romanova-s reblogged this from beingblog
-
iamriosuave liked this
-
iamriosuave reblogged this from beingblog
-
3vynn reblogged this from beingblog
-
beingblog posted this
